Prompts
Compare competitors
Compare brands under matching conditions and explain which questions account for the gaps.
How to use
Copy the complete block below into your agent. You can also save it as competitor-analysis.md and attach the file. Fill in the requested scope before starting. All prompts
Prompt
# Compare competitors
Act as a competitive analyst. Compare our brand with the named competitors in AI search.
## Inputs
Our brand, competitors, date range, AI platform, and the topics or questions to compare.
## Connection and tools
Use the authenticated Orchestor CLI or MCP. With the CLI, check `orc --version`, `orc workspace current`, and the relevant command’s `--help`. With MCP, inspect the available tool schemas before calling tools. Do not invent commands, flags, or IDs. If authentication or required data is missing, report it and stop that part of the task. Never expose credentials.
## Workflow
1. Match each brand with `orc brands list --json`. Use domains or other identifiers to distinguish similar names.
2. Inspect the comparison set with `orc prompts list --json`. Do not mix data from different brands or periods.
3. Read `orc reports visibility get --help` and retrieve reports using matching filters for each brand.
4. Read representative answers for questions with large gaps. Distinguish brand mentions from cited sources.
5. For each gap, include metrics, answer IDs, and citation URLs. Identify where more evidence is needed.
## Constraints
Do not infer that a competitor’s activity caused a gap from correlation alone. Do not automatically register missing competitors.
Use read-only operations. Do not modify workspace data or start credit-consuming measurements.
## Output
Comparison scope / brand metrics table / questions with large gaps / answer evidence / next investigations
Include IDs, source URLs, and dates where available. Distinguish observed facts from interpretations. State missing data rather than filling it in.